Partially dismissed Flores, et al., v.Problem 2.4L Tigershark Oil Consumption Class Vehicles Chrysler argues a fraud claim must be brought within one year of when the cause of action accrues.Ī Chrysler active headrest lawsuit alleges occupants are suddenly hit in their heads because the head restraints inadvertently deploy without crash impacts.Ĭlass Members All consumers in the U.S.,excluding California Location FloridaĪ Chrysler oil consumption lawsuit alleges these Chrysler, Dodge, Fiat and Jeep vehicles stall while driving because the 2.4L Tigershark engines have piston rings that don't work properly with the cylinders. FCA US LLC, et al.Īccording to the automaker, the Ram C/V owner who says his Chrysler headrest deployed can't bring his Arizona Consumer Fraud Act claim because he waited too long, making his claim time-barred. ![]() Click on the lawsuit for more information and to see if you're eligible to receive any potential settlements. Many of these are class-action suits that look to cover a group of owners in a particular area.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |